Architecture Decision Record Template

Architecture decisions are among the most consequential and hardest to reverse choices a technical team makes. A decision made in an afternoon shapes the codebase for years. Most ADRs document the decision after the fact — this template structures the decision-making process itself.

This template applies four complementary frameworks to architecture trade-offs. Pugh Matrix evaluates each option against a baseline (often the status quo). Weighted decision matrix scores across custom criteria like performance, maintainability, and team expertise. Risk Matrix quantifies the downside scenarios. And TCO models the lifetime cost including migration, training, and ongoing operations.

The output is a scored architecture decision record with full methodology transparency — ideal for tech leads documenting decisions for future team members.

Best For

  • Engineering teams evaluating architecture changes
  • Tech leads writing Architecture Decision Records
  • CTOs justifying infrastructure investments to leadership
  • Architects comparing platform migration options

How to Use This Template

  1. 1

    Define the architecture decision and list 2-4 options (include the status quo).

  2. 2

    Describe technical requirements: scale, performance, team size, compliance, timeline.

  3. 3

    SolveRight scores each option across 4 frameworks with risk and TCO modeling.

  4. 4

    Use sensitivity analysis to test which requirements change the recommendation.

  5. 5

    Export as markdown for your ADR repository or PDF for leadership review.

Frameworks in This Template

These frameworks are pre-selected for this template. All 155 frameworks are available in every analysis.

Sample Options

Example options you might compare with this template:

Monolith (current)MicroservicesModular monolith

Use This Template Free

14-day free Pro trial. No credit card required.

Start Solving Free

Full access to all 155 frameworks during trial

Architecture Decision Record Template — Frequently Asked Questions

How is this different from writing a traditional ADR?+
A traditional ADR documents the decision retrospectively. This template structures the analysis that leads to the decision, with quantified scoring across multiple frameworks — then exports in ADR-compatible markdown format.
Can I use this for infrastructure decisions, not just code architecture?+
Yes. Kubernetes vs ECS, self-hosted vs managed, multi-cloud vs single-provider — any technical infrastructure trade-off works with this template.
Does the Pugh Matrix require a baseline option?+
The Pugh Matrix compares options against a reference (baseline). If you're making a greenfield decision, pick your default assumption as the baseline. SolveRight handles the comparison structure automatically.

Ready to Make This Decision?

Join professionals who make decisions with evidence, not instinct.

Start Your Free Trial

14-day Pro trial, no credit card required